|
NEW JERSEY STATE LEGISLATION
Responsible Pit Bull Ownership Licensing Act
A2906/S2381
Assemblyman
Burzichelli officially withdrew A2906
on May 5, 2003. The Assemblyman has
expressed a desire to enact a “Responsible Dog Ownership Law” that all
groups will embrace. We in the Federation commend Burzichelli’s
decision, however we will remain cautious with respect to future
proposals that he might make regarding any “Responsible Dog Ownership
Law”.
Please write
Assemblyman Burzichelli a thank you note for his decision.
Senator James,
sponsor of the identical bill in the Senate (S2381),
is willing to “step back” from the pit bull legislation for the time
being. He is said to want to develop a proposal that will meet his
objective. Feel free to continue to contact Senator James’ office,
973-621-1400 and Senator Rice’s office, 973-371-5665 to let them know
how you feel about this legislation, as it is NOT officially dead.
Also contact your own Senator about S2381.
Senator Sharpe
James Senator
Ronald Rice
Suite 1535, 50 Park Place 1044
South Orange Avenue
Newark, NJ 07102
Newark, NJ 07106
senjames@njleg.org
senrice@njleg.org
A3201 would
clarify that cruelty to animals includes the harming or killing of an
animal through the use of another animal and provides for criminal and
civil penalties for violations thereof.
This bill might consider cropping, docking, and
dewclaw removal as maiming or unnecessary mutilation or
disfigurement. There needs to be an exemption for customary animal
husbandry or veterinary practices. It is unclear whether birds that
are used in Field Trials or Hunting Tests might also fall under some
of the language contained herein.
The bill sponsors are John Burzichelli (District 3: Salem, Cumberland
and Gloucester) and Douglas Fisher (District 3).
Assemblyman John Burzichelli and Assemblyman Douglas Fisher
14 East Commerce St., 3rd Floor
Bridgeton, NJ 08302
856-455-1011
AsmBurzichelli@njleg.org
AsmFisher@njleg.org
A778 would
establish the crime of assault by animal. This crime would occur
whenever a person purposely uses an animal to intimidate or put
another in fear of bodily injury. Under the bill, assault by animal
would be graded as a crime of the fourth degree. The bill would
elevate assault by animal to a crime of the third degree if the animal
causes bodily injury. The bill would elevate assault by animal to a
crime of the second degree if the animal causes significant injury to
a law enforcement officer in the performance of his duties.
NEWS FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY
American Airlines Lifts Breed Ban
After months of negotiations, American Airlines has decided to reverse
its policy on banning Rottweilers, Doberman Pinschers, American
Staffordshire Terriers, Bull Terriers, American Pit Bull Terriers and
any mixed breeds containing one or more of those breeds. Effective May
17th, 2003, all dog breeds will be accepted for shipment,
provided that their shipping containers conform to new “safe
container” requirements.
Acceptable kennels will require releasable cable ties attached to each
of the four corners of the kennel door. American Airlines will
provide these cable ties to the customer at no additional charge.
Acceptable kennels must meet the requirements of the International Air
Transportation Association live Animal Regulations.
California Fanciers Defeat Proposed Ban on Hunting
with Dogs
California Bill AB342, which would have prohibited hunting with dogs or
training for that purpose, was soundly defeated in committee by a vote
of 19-0. The bill was granted reconsideration as a courtesy to the
author, meaning it could come before committee again before next
January. It is unlikely, however, that the author could procure
enough votes for the bill to pass. The AKC will keep a watchful eye
in the event that it does reappear.
Iowa Dog Bill Goes From Bad to Worse
The dangerous dog bill in Iowa has a new number: SF446 (formerly
SSB1195). The breed specific aspects of it have been dropped.
However, SF446 declares all unleashed or unmuzzled dogs dangerous,
while never once addressing the behavior of the dog itself as a
criterion in determining whether its dangerous. Any dog that enters
another person’s property may be seized immediately and destroyed by
the property owner without liability. No exceptions are made. This
bill represents a threat to the safety of dogs throughout Iowa.
|